Exits · enquiries · purchases
Revenue and customers
We compare speed and reliability with exits, enquiries, purchases, and support, using your data to quantify the impact.
MODERNIZATION · PERFORMANCE · FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
Modernizing legacy software that still works and still costs the business.
Slow loading, weak SEO, and expensive changes hold back customer experience and growth. We modernize in safe stages, without an unnecessary rewrite.
- Audit before changes
- Stages based on risk
- No unnecessary rewrite
BUSINESS IMPACT
Where the business loses performance
We measure the problem first and change technology only when the evidence supports it.
LCP within 2.5 s · INP under 200 ms · CLS under 0.1
Speed and trust
Lighthouse shows technical bottlenecks, while available visitor data completes the Core Web Vitals picture.
Indexing · HTML · internal links
SEO and access
We review indexing, content in HTML, metadata, and internal links.
Crawl · sources · structure
AI visibility
AI search needs crawl access, clear answers, authorship, sources, and correct structure.
SOFTWARE MODERNIZATION
We modernize what holds back further growth
01
Technical audit
We measure performance, code health, architecture, and operational risks.
02
Takeover and stabilization
We restore access, documentation, deployment, and control over operations.
03
Refactoring and migrations
We divide changes into reversible stages without unnecessary downtime.
04
Monitoring and further development
We set up oversight and priorities around results and business needs.
Who this is for
When this makes sense
- First step
- A technical audit with a risk map, priorities, and a recommended first scope.
You need to take over a project from another supplier or an internal team.
Technical debt, performance, or deployment slows down every further change.
The system has business value and you do not want to rewrite all of it without a reason.
A PRODUCT IN OPERATION · Existing-store optimization
Rastlinkovo
We did not build Rastlinkovo from scratch. In the existing live WooCommerce store, we focused on performance, bug fixes, and selected interface refinements.
- Engagement type
- Existing-store optimization
- Our role
- We did not build the shop. We came into a working WooCommerce store for performance, fixed bugs, and adjusted selected parts of the interface.
PRICING
Cost follows the state of the system
Sequential stages
Each stage is priced separately. You only continue when the next step makes sense.
01
Technical audit
- A good fit when
- You are taking over an older system and need to know the risks.
- Outcome
- Code, architecture, infrastructure, and operational risks.
- Price for this stage
1 200 € + VAT
Timeline: 3 days
I'm interested in Technical auditWhat you get
- Written report
- Priorities and a recommended next step
02
Takeover and stabilization
- A good fit when
- The system needs a safe takeover without interrupting operation.
- Outcome
- One system, critical access, deployment, and the largest operational risks.
- Price for this stage
from 4 500 € + VAT
Timeline: 2 to 4 weeks
What you get
- System map
- Stabilization changes
03
Modernization stage
- A good fit when
- The audit identified one priority ready for implementation.
- Outcome
- One bounded stage after an audit or takeover.
- Price for this stage
from 8 000 € + VAT
Timeline: 4 to 8 weeks
What you get
- Refactoring or migration
- Tests and monitoring
BRIEF FOR PRICING
Want a more accurate estimate?
Email the file to rise@rise.sk or paste a share link into the form.
Before commissioning the work
Get clear before you commit.
Review the risks, cost and terms of working together.
Before you commit
Comparisons for this service
Custom software vs. off-the-shelf SaaS
Criteria, a table, and real numbers. When an off-the-shelf tool is enough, when your own pays off, and when the answer is to do nothing.
In-house team vs. agency
The real cost of both routes, when a first in-house hire makes sense, when an external team does, and where the line sits.
HOW WE TAKE RESPONSIBILITY
How we reduce risk
Before the first major change, we need to understand the code, operation, and business priorities.
Written system assessment
You receive risks, priorities, and the recommended first scope in a document.
Safe stages
Each stage has a goal, verification method, and deployment plan.
Transferable result
Code, access, and documentation remain under the client’s control.
Brief for leadership and procurement
Decision brief · Software modernization and development
A risk map and first stabilization stage that restores a safe path for further changes.
Changes in an inherited system are slow or risky because control over code and operations is missing.
First paid step
Technical audit
Code, architecture, infrastructure, and operational risks.
3 days1 200 € + VAT
What we need from the client
- • Access to code, environments, deployment, and available documentation.
- • Operational incidents, business priorities, and a person who knows the system.
Email the file to rise@rise.sk or paste a share link into the form.
How to prepare a project briefWhen it is not the right move
When we will not take over a modernization
There is no access to the code, infrastructure, or people who understand operations.
You expect a complete rewrite without an audit or transition plan.
QUESTIONS
Before taking over an existing system
No. We first identify the parts that still work and carry business value. A full rewrite is one option, not the starting point.
Yes. We need access to code, infrastructure, documentation, and the people who know the operation. Then we prepare a risk map and the first safe scope.
Yes. After takeover, we can provide support, monitoring, and further development according to priorities.